Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://library.iigm.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1000
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhodpage, R.N.
dc.contributor.authorHickey, Michael P.
dc.contributor.authorTaori, Alok K.
dc.contributor.authorSiingh, Devendraa
dc.contributor.authorPatil, P.T.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T11:47:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T09:45:18Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T11:47:50Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T09:45:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16, 5611–5621, doi: 10.5194/acp-16-5611-2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1000
dc.description.abstractQuasi-monochromatic gravity-wave-induced oscillations, monitored using the mesospheric OH airglow emission over Kolhapur (16.8◦ N, 74.2◦ E), India, during January to April 2010 and January to December 2011, have been characterized using the Krassovsky method. The nocturnal variability reveals prominent wave signatures with periods ranging from 5.2 to 10.8 h as the dominant nocturnal wave with embedded short-period waves having wave periods of 1.5–4.4 h. The results show that the magnitude of the Krassovsky parameter, viz. |η|, ranged from 2.1 to 10.2 h for principal or long nocturnal waves (5.2–10.8 h observed periods), and from 1.5 to 5.4 h for the short waves (1.5–4.4 h observed periods) during the years of 2010 and 2011, respectively. The phase (i.e., 8) values of the Krassovsky parameters exhibited larger variability and varied from −8.1 to −167◦ . The deduced mean vertical wavelengths are found to be approximately −60.2 ± 20 and −42.8 ± 35 km for longand short-period waves for the year 2010. Similarly, for 2011 the mean vertical wavelengths are found to be approximately −77.6 ± 30 and −59.2 ± 30 km for long and short wave periods, respectively, indicating that the observations over Kolhapur were dominated by upward-propagating waves. We use a full-wave model to simulate the response of OH emission to the wave motion and compare the results with observed values. In the present report, we discuss the observed wave characteristics and cause of the noted diferences.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectOH Airglowen_US
dc.subjectKrassovsky methoden_US
dc.subjectMultispectral photometeren_US
dc.titleResponse of OH airglow emissions to mesospheric gravity waves and comparisons with full-wave model simulation at a low-latitude Indian stationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.accession091542
Appears in Collections:UAS_Reprints

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
GhodpageN_PatilPT_etal_ACPD, 2015.pdf1.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.