Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://library.iigm.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1098
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRao, N. Venkateswara
dc.contributor.authorRatnam, M. Venkat
dc.contributor.authorVedavathi, C.
dc.contributor.authorTsuda, T.
dc.contributor.authorMurthy, B.V. Krishna
dc.contributor.authorSathishkumar, S.
dc.contributor.authorGurubaran, S.
dc.contributor.authorKumar, K. Kishore
dc.contributor.authorSubrahmanyam, K.V.
dc.contributor.authorRao, S. Vijaya Bhaskara
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-08T07:25:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T09:59:05Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-08T07:25:22Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T09:59:05Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Atmospheric and Solar--Terrestrial Physics, 152, 20–29, doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2016.11.005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1098-
dc.description.abstractWe analyzed 17 years (1993–2009) of horizontal winds measured by the medium frequency (MF) radar located at Tirunelveli (8.7°N, 77.8°E) and 10 years (2005–2014) of horizontal winds measured by a meteor radar located at Thumba (8.5°N, 77°E) to examine the seasonal, inter-annual, and solar cycle variability of the Quasi- Two Day Wave (QTDW) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere region. These two radars are nearly colocated, but differ in their measurement technique. Comparison of the estimated QTDW amplitudes by the two radars shows that the amplitudes are larger in the meteor radar than those in the MF radar. The difference between the amplitudes is larger in May in the zonal component and in April and September in the meridional one. Furthermore, the differences are larger in the meridional component. The QTDWs in both the radars show a strong semi-annual oscillation (SAO). In addition, the meridional QTDW amplitudes of both the MF and meteor radars show a distinct enhancement in the month of October. While the whole spectra of QTDWs contribute to the SAO amplitudes, only 45–50 h waves contribute to the October enhancement. The amplitudes of the QTDWs, in general, show large inter-annual variability. The QTDW amplitudes from both the radars show modulation at period of quasi-biennial oscillation. The QTDWs of the MF radar show a small negative correlation with solar activity while those of meteor radar do not show any correlation. The above aspects are discussed in the light of current understanding of the QTDWs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMF radaren_US
dc.subjectSolar Cycleen_US
dc.subjectQBOen_US
dc.subjectMLT regionen_US
dc.subjectMesosphere and lower thermosphereen_US
dc.subjectMeteor radaren_US
dc.subjectQuasi-Two Day Waveen_US
dc.titleSeasonal, inter-annual and solar cycle variability of the quasi two day wave in the low-latitude mesosphere and lower thermosphereen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.accession091641
Appears in Collections:UAS_Reprints

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SathishkumarS_GurubaranS_etal_JASTP_2017.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.