Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://library.iigm.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456798/145
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.contributor.authorOkoh, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHabarulema, John Bosco
dc.contributor.authorRabiu, Babatunde
dc.contributor.authorSeemala, Gopi
dc.contributor.authorWisdom, Joshua Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorOlwendo, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorObrou, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorMatamba, Tshimangadzo Merline
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T09:49:32Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T09:49:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSpace Weather, v. 18. 9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002525en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.iigm.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456798/145
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the development of a storm‐time total electron content (TEC) model over the African sector for the first time. The storm criterion used was |Dst|≥50 nT and Kp ≥ 4. We have utilized Global Positioning System (GPS) observations from 2000 to 2018 from about 252 receivers over the African continent and surroundings within spatial coverage of 40°S–40°N latitude and 25°W–60°Elongitude. To increase data coverage in areas devoid of ground‐based instrumentation including oceans, we used the available radio occultation Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) TEC from 2008 to 2018. The model is based on artificial neural networks which are used to learn the relationship between TEC and the corresponding physical/geophysical input parameters representing factors which influence ionospheric variability. An important result from this effort was the inclusion of the time history of the geomagnetic activity indicators (dKp/dt and dDst/dt) which improved TEC modeling by about 5% and 12% in middle and low latitudes, respectively. Overall, the model performs comparatively well with, and sometimes better than, the earlier single station modeling efforts even during quiet conditions. Given that this is a storm‐time model, this result is encouraging since it is challenging to model ionospheric parameters during geomagnetically disturbed conditions. Statistically, the average root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) between modeled and GPS TEC is 5.5 TECU (percentage error¼30.3%) and5.0 TECU (percentage error¼30.4%) for the Southern and Northern Hemisphere mid latitudes respectively compared to 7.5 TECU (percentage error¼22.0%) in low latitudes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectTotal electron contenten_US
dc.subjectIonosphereen_US
dc.subjectStorm‐time modelen_US
dc.titleStorm‐time modeling of the African regional ionospheric total electron content using artificial neural networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.sourcehttps://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002525
Appears in Collections:UAS_Reprints

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SeemalaG_etal_SpWeather_2020.pdf3.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.