dc.contributor.author |
Reddy, C. D. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Arora, B. R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-04-16T08:27:34Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-04-16T08:27:34Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1993 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 1993, Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 775-785, DOI https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.45.775 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://library.iigm.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1846 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Geomagnetic variations, recorded through a two-phase magnetovariational study carried out along the Ganga-Yamuna valley of the Garhwal Himalaya, northwest India, are reduced to a set of induction arrows spanning a period range of 12-128 minutes. The spatial behaviour of induction response indicates that the Main Frontal Thrust is a major electrical discontinuity with enhanced conductivity to the south, beneath the Indo-Gangetic plains. Simple two-dimensional (2-D) geoelectrical models with geophysical constraints on the thickness and resistivity of the sedimentary sequences indicate that the induced currents in the Indo-Gangetic plains contribute little to the observed induction response. A full 2-D electrical resistivity model which reproduces the observed electromagnetic response, essentially requires a highly conducting layer at mid-crustal depth beneath the Indo-Gangetic Plains, becoming less conducting on underthrusting beneath the frontal Himalayan belt. This layer coincides with the brittle-to-ductile transition zone along which lie the foci of most moderate earthquakes. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Geomagnetic Induction |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Thrust Zones |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Himalaya |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ganga-Yamuna Valley |
en_US |
dc.title |
Quantitative Interpretation of Geomagnetic Induction Response Across the Thrust Zones of the Himalaya along the Ganga-Yamuna Valley |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |