Comparison of observed equatorial spread-F statistics between two longitudinally separated magnetic equatorial stations and the IRI-2016 model during low and high solar activities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Thammavongsy, P.
dc.contributor.author Supnithi, P.
dc.contributor.author Myint, L.M.M.
dc.contributor.author Sripathi, S.
dc.contributor.author Hozumi, K.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-01T08:48:24Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-01T08:48:24Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Advances in Space Research, v. 69, 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.12.050 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://library.iigm.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456798/241
dc.description.abstract This study compares the equatorial spread-F (ESF) statistics in equinoctial months at two stations near the magnetic equator and longitudinally separated: Chumphon (CPN) station (10.7°N, 99.4°E; geomagnetic latitude: 3.0°N), Thailand and Tirunelveli (TIR) station (8.73°N, 77.7°E; geomagnetic latitude: 0.32°N), India. The ionogram images are manually scaled at every 10 min and 15 min during the low solar activity (LSA) in 2008 and the high solar activity (HSA) in 2014. In particular, the range-type spread F (RSF) statistics are extensively analysed. We study the ESF occurrence percentages, ESF durations, and ESF day-to-day variabilities. At both stations, the percentages of the ESF occurrences are generally higher as the F10.7 solar flux values increase, therefore, resulting in more occurrences in HSA than LSA. The percentages of the ESF occurrences could reach up to 50% and 90% during LSA and HSA, respectively. The post-midnight ESF occurrences are more frequent at TIR station than CPN station. The onset time analyses of ESF events show that during HSA (2014), the ESF onsets at TIR station are earlier than CPN station by 15 min to 1 h and as frequent as 72% in each month. During LSA, the long ESF durations are observed at TIR station more frequently than at CPN station. In addition, the comparison between the observations and the predictions of the IRI-2016 model shows that the overestimations of the IRI-2016 model are up to 33% during LSA, but underestimations of the model are up to 25% during HAS. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Equatorial Spread-F en_US
dc.subject ESF onset en_US
dc.subject Probability of Spread-F occurrences en_US
dc.subject Spread-F duration en_US
dc.subject IRI 2016 model en_US
dc.title Comparison of observed equatorial spread-F statistics between two longitudinally separated magnetic equatorial stations and the IRI-2016 model during low and high solar activities en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dcterms.source https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.12.050


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account